Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 31st July 2010

BUDGET CUTS: Union reacts to cuts proposals

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 February 2010
PUBLIC sector union Unison said it will "stand by" council workers if they are forced into compulsory redundancies as a result of budget cuts.

With 1,000 jobs now at risk, the council has included unions in its consultation process until a d
ecision is made in December on how the council can save £45 million.

If better proposals are put forward, the need to shed as many jobs and service cuts may not happen, but the outlook is not good and Unison believes council workers should not shoulder the responsibility for the recession.

A spokesperson for Unison's West Lothian Branch said: "Major cuts like those in this report mean cuts in frontline services, increased charges and major damage to a local economy already weakened by recession.

"Neither the people of West Lothian nor the local council workers caused the recession and Unison sees no reason why they should be told that they have to pay for it.

"Unison strongly opposes any suggestion of compulsory redundancy and will continue to stand up for the West Lothian workforce who are trying to answer increasing demands with less and less resources.

"The proposals suggest cuts across all departments and will inevitably mean services will suffer."

The council's contingency plans have also been criticised by opposition councillors who say the SNP-led administration is failing in its education promises by cutting teacher numbers in West Lothian.

Graeme Morrice, leader of West Lothian Council's Labour group, has accused the administration of "hypocrisy" over proposals to increase class sizes.

To save money the council is proposing to trim about 50 teachers through efficiency measures. This would mean that county class sizes, which are currently well under national levels, would increase.

Innovative ideas to reduce teacher numbers include a "virtual" sixth form for schools where one teacher could do a subject using camera links to several schools.

"This is sheer hypocrisy," said Cllr Morrice. "Already there are more than 2,000 fewer teachers in Scotland after the SNP promised to raise teacher numbers in Scotland when it came to power.

"It is an absolute disgrace that SNP councillors are forcing through this major cuts package along with the support of their Tory and Action To Save St John's Hospital cronies.

"They have kept opposition Labour councillors in the dark and only sprung this on us at the last minute. We have not had a chance to go through this to offer alternatives while they have been working on it for six months.

"In one foul swoop The SNP are undoing all good work carried out by the previous Labour administration. The services the council provide, and the council workers who provide them, will suffer greatly as a result of the actions of the SNP and this can only be bad for our communities."

Neil Findlay, Labour councillor for Fauldhouse, also submitted a motion at the council executive meeting on Tuesday saying the West Lothian Council Labour group rejected recommendations on revising the council's management structure and restrictions on recruitment.

He said: "We seek full and comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders and want to see the chief executive bring back fully costed reports to future council meetings so that all elected members can be involved in the decision-making process, and not just the chosen few."

Council leader Peter Johnston said the proposals are not those of the SNP's and have been recommended by council officials as a way of bridging the funding gap.

"Councillor Morrice is clearly living in denial," added Cllr Johnston. "The fact is that thanks to the financial incompetence of the Labour UK government, West Lothian Council is facing a cut of £45m in our budget over the next three years.

"These facts are recognised by Cosla, Audit Scotland and every other responsible body.

"Labour's amendment today was to do nothing and, like the ostrich, stick its head in the sand and hope that the financial tsunami heading our way will pass us by.

"This is playground politics at its worst. Today, we accepted proposals to save £370,000 a year by reducing senior management. Labour opposed this.

"There are no SNP proposals to cut teachers or anything else. What we are doing, however, is beginning a process of community consultation and over the next six or seven months, during which we will be openly and honestly engaging with our community as we look to determine the best possible way to absorb the Labour cuts in council funding and continue to deliver first-class, effective and efficient public services.

"Labour opposed this consultation and voted to do nothing. Frankly Labour are a total shambles."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 February 2010 11:00 AM
  • Source: West Lothian Herald and Post
  • Location: West Lothian
 
Prev
1
Next
1

The Ranting Nationalist,

EAST CALDER 25/02/2010 13:37:32
I agree that ordinary workers shouldn't have to shoulder the costs of the carnage created by the banking weasel fraternity and it's only fair that the unions should stand up for their members. However, I wonder would the unions be quite so preciptate to castigate a Labour run council; I seriously doubt it.
The shortfall of 45 million pounds is a serious amount of money out of a budget of 300 odd million; however I believe Labour and the SNP are missing a trick here. Everyone is disgusted at the 1.7 billion that virtually nationalised RBS is paying its high flyers. Instead of wringing their hands, the political powers that be should have taken that amount and split it between all 32 Scottish councils: that would have given each local authority 53 million extra each; after all it is a Scottish bank and disgusting that having declared a 3 billion pound loss, it's still paying such a bonus.
As an anecdote, an acquaintance at the bank was wondering whether he should take a BMW,AUDI or MERCEDES as his company car and whether to buy a second holiday home in the USA with his bonus. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be lucky to hold onto our jobs; let alone even hope for a wage rise to keep pace with an inflation rate currently above 3 percent.
2

David Vass,

Livingston 04/03/2010 16:25:24
We could not allow the banks to fail as this alone would have given Scotland another 35,000+ unemployed, together with the fact it would have effected every community. The Banks were at fault together with the "Bungling" chancellors we have had over the last decades. But the fat remains we have a Civil Service that has been allowed to grow and grow to the state it is now, totally unsustainable. Since we cannot brrow more to fund this Service and as the public we cannot afford more taxes to simply keep these individuals in work. nder the FOI Act I found out it costs over £260,000,000.00 to fund the salaries of West Lothian Council alone, tha is for a population of just over 150,000 it's not "Rocket Science." Then under the FOI Act you all should ask to see the amount of employees they have and their Salaries, there lies the problem, too many Managers and Jobsworth and very few actual workers. Why is it that Local Councils cannot be run like a Business, so it is functional and supports the Community. The Banks now should support a massive building project that will help the Local Economy, with Jobs and Houses that have been required for years, after all a timber kit House will cost no more than £20,000 West Lothian Council has the Land, we have the unemployed to fill the vacancies, let the banks provide Local Morgages worked wih the Council on 40year Mortages, we would all benefit and in turn we can abolish Council Tax for Pensioners. It makes sense and is what this Constituency needs. Together with an Independent Council free from Corruption and Waste.
Only Together can we do this, make sure you vote Independent and shall make sure it happens as they cannot fight us all as one.
People need to look at there worth to Society when in Public Office, by that I am aiming a shot at those within West Lothian Council collecting the 35,000+ Salaries, there are many of them.
3

David Vass,

Livingston 05/03/2010 10:59:10
My friend in East Calder, you ar right, there s something untoward with this Editor and Cllr Morrice in particular.

The answer is to ake sure we do not get another "Devine MP"
4

David Vass,

Livingston 05/03/2010 11:00:03
It's refreshing to see that Cllr Morrices "Buddy" Scott McAngus has not removed this comment.
It seems very strange indeed that the Editor of this "Free Weekly Paper" only seems to "Moderate" on certain comments made when he is asked to by the Sleeze ball that is Cllr Morrice
5

David Vass,

Livingston 09/03/2010 16:41:02
Here are the full expenses of Draeme Morrice under the FOI Act

I would like the full expenses of Cllr Graeme Morrice during his time within West Lothian Council - The information you requested is provided in the table below:


Tax Year Expenses

1999-2000 4,173.62

2000-2001 3,832.68

2001-2002 5,555.79

2002-2003 5,200.90

2003-2004 6,167.95

2004-2005 4,651.95

2005-2006 4,839.49

2006-2007 4,842.78

2007-2008 4,613.47

2008-2009 4,748.63

2009 to Jan 2010 3,586.91
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.